<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Moral Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamstrange.com/politics/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics</link>
	<description>Political commentary from outside the moral matrix.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:27:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Banker stabs cab driver over sense of Social Security &amp; Medicare, umm, I mean &#8220;entitlement.&#8221; by xerox cliche</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/entitlements-medicare-social-security.html#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>xerox cliche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=132#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam - I&#039;m not especially computer literate or on facebook so this is the way I have found you so far - hope you read comments - I saw your master narrative vid on TYT. You and the author of the book may have thought of this already but I had an additional level of thinking to add to your method of articulating the emotional progressive message - each side conservative and progressive has contradictions - they have to integrate an element of the other to become full. Imagine concentric circles with empowerment at the core ( though it could combine empathy as well - different combos possible). then empathy, responsibility, protection. The root of contradiction is always in the core, take empowerment/empathy - the core is essentially libertarian or anarchist - most isms try to answer the private public tension. Contemporary progressive thinking sieves the past for nuggets to provide cultural continuity (empathy) like conservatism does but essentially pushes the reset button but it doesn&#039;t fill the void like the conservatives do with the imagery of  past norms - there is an amorphous culture of progressive thinking that is then modulated by &#039;discussion&#039; as you explained in your video - there needs to be more than just about articulating a master narrative - something Obama did well in his previous campaign - the core of how an individual relates to society is missing in Obama. Personal freedom has been down played by the other 3 and the conservatives profit from this (literally). The Gay marriage issue is a rare moment when the individual rights are articulated against the traditional culture - though it only came about because public opinion had shifted -  the progressives shrink from the core value of empowerment if the mob demands it (hence democratic) - the democrats need to take individual empowerment to their core and have all other policy come out from this - essentially you are free to do anything and empowered to do anything so long as it does not cross social norm limits of harm (balanced by common sense and practicality/community/education/welfare) - self harm limits exist also but are much higher. Laws then flow from this platform - progressives allow good intention to subvert individual freedom simply because it is not overtly addressed in discourse or policy. the conservative response is hold back change in nearly all forms because this contradiction is not addressed. Blah Blah hope there is some interesting thoughts here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam &#8211; I&#8217;m not especially computer literate or on facebook so this is the way I have found you so far &#8211; hope you read comments &#8211; I saw your master narrative vid on TYT. You and the author of the book may have thought of this already but I had an additional level of thinking to add to your method of articulating the emotional progressive message &#8211; each side conservative and progressive has contradictions &#8211; they have to integrate an element of the other to become full. Imagine concentric circles with empowerment at the core ( though it could combine empathy as well &#8211; different combos possible). then empathy, responsibility, protection. The root of contradiction is always in the core, take empowerment/empathy &#8211; the core is essentially libertarian or anarchist &#8211; most isms try to answer the private public tension. Contemporary progressive thinking sieves the past for nuggets to provide cultural continuity (empathy) like conservatism does but essentially pushes the reset button but it doesn&#8217;t fill the void like the conservatives do with the imagery of  past norms &#8211; there is an amorphous culture of progressive thinking that is then modulated by &#8216;discussion&#8217; as you explained in your video &#8211; there needs to be more than just about articulating a master narrative &#8211; something Obama did well in his previous campaign &#8211; the core of how an individual relates to society is missing in Obama. Personal freedom has been down played by the other 3 and the conservatives profit from this (literally). The Gay marriage issue is a rare moment when the individual rights are articulated against the traditional culture &#8211; though it only came about because public opinion had shifted &#8211;  the progressives shrink from the core value of empowerment if the mob demands it (hence democratic) &#8211; the democrats need to take individual empowerment to their core and have all other policy come out from this &#8211; essentially you are free to do anything and empowered to do anything so long as it does not cross social norm limits of harm (balanced by common sense and practicality/community/education/welfare) &#8211; self harm limits exist also but are much higher. Laws then flow from this platform &#8211; progressives allow good intention to subvert individual freedom simply because it is not overtly addressed in discourse or policy. the conservative response is hold back change in nearly all forms because this contradiction is not addressed. Blah Blah hope there is some interesting thoughts here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Banker stabs cab driver over sense of Social Security &amp; Medicare, umm, I mean &#8220;entitlement.&#8221; by tresa lamb</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/entitlements-medicare-social-security.html#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>tresa lamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=132#comment-50</guid>
		<description>What I have just seen is true.  I&#039;ve seen &amp; experienced this type of behavior my entire life.  I have a lot of rage due to &quot;entitlement&quot; attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I have just seen is true.  I&#8217;ve seen &amp; experienced this type of behavior my entire life.  I have a lot of rage due to &#8220;entitlement&#8221; attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Banker stabs cab driver over sense of Social Security &amp; Medicare, umm, I mean &#8220;entitlement.&#8221; by auto body repair</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/entitlements-medicare-social-security.html#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>auto body repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 02:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=132#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Thanks for one&#039;s marvelous posting! I certainly enjoyed reading it, you are a great author.I will always bookmark your blog and will often come back later in life. I want to encourage you to continue your great work, have a nice morning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for one&#8217;s marvelous posting! I certainly enjoyed reading it, you are a great author.I will always bookmark your blog and will often come back later in life. I want to encourage you to continue your great work, have a nice morning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Banker stabs cab driver over sense of Social Security &amp; Medicare, umm, I mean &#8220;entitlement.&#8221; by Collision Center</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/entitlements-medicare-social-security.html#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Collision Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 02:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=132#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Just where is the facebook like button ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just where is the facebook like button ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Cenk Uygur&#8217;s &#8220;Corporate Whore&#8221; argument is weak sauce. by Collision Center</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/why-cenk-uygurs-corporate-whore-argument-is-weak-sauce.html#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Collision Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=49#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Someone needs to give Louie Gohmert a reality show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone needs to give Louie Gohmert a reality show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Banker stabs cab driver over sense of Social Security &amp; Medicare, umm, I mean &#8220;entitlement.&#8221; by Collision Center</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/entitlements-medicare-social-security.html#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Collision Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=132#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Really like the fresh layout. I really liked this article. Thanks for a useful posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really like the fresh layout. I really liked this article. Thanks for a useful posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Cenk Uygur’s “Tax the Rich” argument sucks. by Auto Repair San Francisco</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/cenk-uygurs-tax-the-rich-argument.html#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Auto Repair San Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=5#comment-19</guid>
		<description>great posts you have here, if you update it a little often, then that would be very helpful for us. thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great posts you have here, if you update it a little often, then that would be very helpful for us. thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Young Turks 3-1-12 by Auto Repair</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/the-young-turks-3-1-12.html#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Auto Repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=100#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I basically learned about virtually all of this, but that being said, I still assumed it turned out helpful. Good task!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I basically learned about virtually all of this, but that being said, I still assumed it turned out helpful. Good task!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Cenk Uygur’s “Tax the Rich” argument sucks. by Adriana</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/cenk-uygurs-tax-the-rich-argument.html#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=5#comment-3</guid>
		<description>thanks for share!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for share!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Cenk Uygur’s “Tax the Rich” argument sucks. by BMW Repair</title>
		<link>http://adamstrange.com/politics/young-turks/cenk-uygurs-tax-the-rich-argument.html#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>BMW Repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamstrange.com/politics/?p=5#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi, really like the appearance of ones website. Can you mind saying what theme youre making use of? I’m not used to this and i am hoping to have mine looking anywhere close to cool as yours. Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, really like the appearance of ones website. Can you mind saying what theme youre making use of? I’m not used to this and i am hoping to have mine looking anywhere close to cool as yours. Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

